Conservative columnist George Will, the voice of Reagan Republicans, wrote in his syndicated Washington Post column this weekend of the absurdity of laws against online casinos, and the explanations online poker and Internet gambling have to be legal. The argument, coming from probably the most logical and precise thinkers within the Republican camp, may serve to further widen the diversities between libertarian Republicans equivalent to Will and spiritual radicals trying to force lifestyle choices on others.
Will brings up the seldom-addressed point that, in passing the UIGEA, Congress not just curried favor with church groups, but in addition protected state government revenues derived from lottery gambling. By passing the web casino ban, the government acted to make sure gaming patrons could be limited to choices that fed state revenue.
But, he notes, by government accepting gambling as part of its business, the ethical ground is lost.
"Having turned gambling, which once was treated as a sin, right into a social policy, government looks unusually silly criminalizing online kinds of it," says Will. He notes that "gambling is productive of delight for hundreds of thousands of american citizens for whom this is a frequent pastime," and wonders "whether government should attempt to tightly circumscribe a ubiquitous human activity that generally harms nobody."
Will goes directly to state an excellent stronger case for online poker, noting that the sport of skill doesn't need to be lumped in a class with games of chance.
"Congress probably should fold its interference with Internet gambling, and definitely should get its 10 thumbs off Americans' freedom to exercise their poker skills online," Will concludes.
Published on August 17, 2009 by JoshuaMcCarthy
Read More... [Source: Religious Gambling News]
No comments:
Post a Comment